Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Sufficiency of Understanding for Moral Justification in Cultural Appropriation

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/phij.2026.050108 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 40

Author(s)

Qiu Keyi 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Faculty of Foreign Languages, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China

Corresponding Author

Qiu Keyi

ABSTRACT

In contemporary debates on cultural appropriation, "understanding" is frequently seen as a moral defense. This paper argues that such appeals are conceptually and structurally insufficient for moral justification. Conceptually, I argue that moral evaluation must distinguish between the quality of an agent's motivation and the normative status of the act. To ground this claim, I turn to deontological ethics, particularly Kant's insight that an action has moral worth only if done from duty, not merely in accordance with it. From this perspective, understanding is an empirical motive that falls short of the demand to act out of respect for moral law. Consequentially, I situate this analysis within real-world conditions of structural inequality, showing how a focus on individual understanding often diverts attention from systemic harms, such as epistemic injustice and unequal cultural benefit. The paper concludes that treating epistemic virtue as sufficient for moral justification involves a category mistake in applied ethics, and that clearer distinctions are needed in evaluating cultural practices under conditions of social inequality.

KEYWORDS

Cultural Appropriation; Moral Justification; Structural Injustice; Cross-Cultural Exchange

CITE THIS PAPER

Qiu Keyi. The Sufficiency of Understanding for Moral Justification in Cultural Appropriation. Philosophy Journal (2026). Vol. 5, No.1, 49-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/phij.2026.050108.

REFERENCES

[1] Schutz, D. (2017) Open Casket. Whitney Museum of American Art, New York.
[2] Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters, Inc., No. 12-cv-01950 (D.N.M. 2012).
[3] Young, J.O. (2008) Profound Offense and Cultural Appropriation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66(2), 135-146.
[4] Young, J.O. (2008) Cultural Appropriation and the Arts. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
[5] Bhabha, H.K. (1994) The Location of Culture. Routledge, London.
[6] Kant, I. (1785) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[7] Korsgaard, C.M. (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends: Kantian Ethics and the Ethics of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[8] Shahvisi, A. (2020) Cultural Appropriation: A Structural Analysis. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(4), 727-743.
[9] Berry, J.W. (1997) Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34.
[10] Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books, New York.
[11] O'Neill, O. (1989) Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[12] Kazez, J. (2021) Cultural Appropriation and the Virtues of Cross-Cultural Engagement. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38(3), 456-471.
[13] Scanlon, T.M. (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p. 153.
[14] Cowan, J.K. (1990) Dance and the Body Politic in Northern Greece. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[15] Aristotle (2000) Nicomachean Ethics (Trans. R. Crisp). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[16] Holtz, R. (2014) Domination and Freedom in Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[17] Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[18] Disney (2020) Disney Annual Report 2020. The Walt Disney Company, Burbank.
[19] UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2020) Feature Film Production by Region. Available at: http://data.uis.unesco.org/
[20] ASCAP (2021) Royalty Distribution Report 2021. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, New York.
[21] Herder, J. G. (2024). Ideas for the philosophy of the history of mankind (G. M. Moore, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1784–1791). https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691255705
[22] Marcuse, H. (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press, Boston.
[23] WIPO (2022) Draft Articles on Traditional Cultural Expressions. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.
[24] Sami Parliament (2017) Sami Cultural Heritage Act. Sami Parliament, Karasjok.
[25] World Archaeological Congress (2021) Digital Heritage and Indigenous Rights: Policy Guidelines. WAC, London.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.