Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on R&D Risk Management of Projects Based on Extended FMEA

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ieim.2026.090103 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 13

Author(s)

Liang Jianhua 1, Ni Feng 1, Liu Jiang 1, Wei Jin 1, Fu Rui 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China

Corresponding Author

Ni Feng

ABSTRACT

In the contemporary era, smartphone research and development is characterized by substantial R&D investment, high confidentiality requirements, diverse influencing factors, and elevated technical risks. It is imperative to implement effective risk management in project R&D, identify potential risk influencing factors in advance, accurately assess the risk levels of each factor, and deploy limited human and material resources to prevent and improve key risk factors. Taking the smartphone NPI project of Company L as a case study, this paper proposes a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for failure modes extended from FMEA. By integrating subjective and objective analyses as well as qualitative and quantitative methods, the proposed approach achieves a more precise assessment of risks in smartphone NPI R&D projects.

KEYWORDS

Risk Level, FMEA, Risk Management

CITE THIS PAPER

Liang Jianhua, Ni Feng, Liu Jiang, Wei Jin, Fu Rui. Research on R&D Risk Management of Projects Based on Extended FMEA. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2026). Vol. 9, No.1, 23-35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2026.090103.

REFERENCES

[1] Hu Ying, Yang Yuwu. Research on Value-Oriented Project Risk Management Mechanism [J]. Management and Administration, 2014(10): 4. DOI: CNKI:SUN:JYGU.0.2014-10-039. 
[2] Wan Yan, Tian Yuan. The Evolution of Drucker's Management Theory and Its Influence on Enterprises in the 21st Century [J]. Modern Marketing, 2024(3): 10-12. 
[3] Zeng Xiaorui. Analysis on the Era Significance and Limitations of the "Four Steps to Excellent Enterprises" [J]. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2023, 44(2): 48-50. DOI: 10.19311/j.cnki.1672-3198.2023.02.017. 
[4] Maruboyina R. Project Uncertainty Management [J]. Cost Engineering, 12, 2003. 
[5] Li Longfei. Risk Assessment of Farmland Irrigation Based on Combined Weighting of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Entropy Weight Method [J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2021(8): 102-105. 
[6] Li Meng, Wang Haifeng, Wang Xiaoyong, et al. Risk Assessment Method of Wave Energy Converter Based on FMEA and Fuzzy TOPSIS [J]. Ship Engineering, 2023, 45(1): 6-16.
[7] Shi Xudong, Cheng Boyuan, Huang Kun, et al. Risk Evaluation of Aircraft IDG Based on Fuzzy TOPSIS-FMEA [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 2060-2064. 
[8] Huang Fenglan, Ni Feng, Liu Jiang, et al. Executable Modeling Method of Business Architecture Based on ROAD-CPN [J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2023, 45(5): 534-542. 
[9] Zhong Xianxin, Ni Feng, Liu Jiang, et al. Scene-Oriented Business Architecture Modeling Method Based on ROADS [J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2023, 45(4): 415-424. 
[10] Huang Fenglan, Ni Feng, Liu Jiang, et al. Data Flow Modeling and Verification of Complex BPMN Collaboration Model Based on HCPN [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2024, 30(5): 1754-1769. 
[11] Saaty T L. What is the analytic hierarchy process? [C]//Proceedings of the 1988 International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 1988.
[12] Jiang Dongfang, Zhang Yantao, Yue Binbin, et al. Risk Assessment of Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process [J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2011, 40(8): 873-875, 878.

Downloads: 28469
Visits: 917983

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.