Author(s)

Dandan Qin ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Hubei Business College, Wuhan, China

Corresponding Author

Dandan Qin

ABSTRACT

As China's most influential large-scale high-stakes assessment, the National Matriculation English Test (NMET) has garnered extensive attention. This study investigates the principles of text selection for the reading component of NMET. Based on a corpus analysis of 30 reading texts in the NMET Volume I (2016-2025) and interviews with 10 experienced teachers, the findings reveal a consistent sourcing of texts from authentic English-language media. These texts are further characterized by close alignment with the high school curriculum in both thematic scope and lexical demand, ensuring pedagogical coherence. The study provides practical insights for instructional material selection and test design refinement.

KEYWORDS

Corpus; language testing; text selection; mixed methods

CITE THIS PAPER

Dandan Qin, Corpus-Based Analysis of Reading Text Selection Criteria in the National Matriculation English Test. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2025) Vol. 8: 42-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2025.080907.

REFERENCES

[1] Cheng, L. (2008). The key to success: English language testing in China. Language Testing, 25(1), 15-37.
[2] Yu, X. (2021). Text complexity of reading comprehension passages in the national matriculation English test in China: The development from 1996 to 2020. International Journal of Language Testing, 11(2), 142-167.
[3] Bunch, G. C., Walqui, A., and Pearson, P. D. (2014). Complex text and new common standards in the United States: Pedagogical implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 533-559. 
[4] Hu, Y. (2006). Two thoughts on secondary school English reading instruction. Policy and Scientific Consult, 6(2), 39-40.
[5] Luo, C. K. (2007). Vocabulary instruction in secondary schools. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Information, 13(1), 203-207.
[6] Miao, X. H. (2010). Problems and strategies on vocabulary instruction in secondary schools. Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Education, 26(2), 150-153.
[7] Bax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking. Language Testing, 30(4), 441-465.
[8] Weir, C., Hawkey, R., Green, A., and Devi, S. (2012). The cognitive processes underlying the academic reading construct as measured by IELTS. IELTS collected papers, 33(2), 212-269.
[9] Green, A., and Hawkey, R. (2012). Re-fitting for a different purpose: A case study of item writer practices in adapting source texts for a test of academic reading Language Testing, 29(1), 109-129.
[10] Salisbury, K. (2005). The edge of expertise: towards an understanding of listening test item writing as professional practice (Doctoral dissertation, University of London).
[11] Kim, J., Chi, Y., Huensch, A., Jun, H., Li, H., and Roullion, V. (2010). A case study on an item writing process: Use of test specifications, nature of group dynamics, and individual item writers' characteristics. Language Assessment Quarterly,7(2), 160-174.
[12] Gu, X. D. (2020). A comparative study on the source and adaptation of CET-6 and IELTS reading texts. Foreign languages and translation, 67(3), 52-64.
[13] Zhang, H. Q. and Gu, X. D. (2019). An Analysis of the Text Adaptation Methods of the National Matriculation English Test Reading Materials: A Case Study of NMET 2018. China Examinations, 331(11), 36-42.
[14] Green, A. (2013). Adapting or developing source material for listening and reading tests. The companion to language assessment, 10(2), 830-846.
[15] Lee, W. Y. C. (1995). Authenticity revisited: Text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal, 49(4), 323-328.
[16] Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., and McNamara, D. S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 15-30.
[17] Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford Pergamon Press.
[18] Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in a foreign language. learning. Language teaching, 40(2), 97-118.
[19] Sanderson, P. (1999). Using Newspapers in the Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
[20] Kathiresan, K. (2022). Use of Newspapers in Developing Language Skills. Journal of. Positive School Psychology, 6 (4), 7215-7219.
[21] Bachman, L.F.and Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
[22] Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press.
[23] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
[24] August, D., Francis, D.J., Hsu, H.-Y.A. and Snow, C.E. (2006). Assessing reading comprehension in bilinguals. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 221–238. doi:10.1086/510656.
[25] Alexander, P. A., and Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 3 (pp. 285–310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[26] Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.
[27] Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.
[28] Abu-Rabia, S. (2003). Cognitive and social factors affecting Arab students learning English as a third language in Israel. Educational Psychology, 23(4), 347–360.
[29] Burgoyne, K., Whiteley, H. E., and Hutchinson, J. M. (2013). The role of background knowledge in text comprehension for children learning English as an additional language. Journal of Research in Reading,36(2), 132-148.
[30] McNamara, D. S., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse processes, 22(3), 247-288.
[31] Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., and Bayyurt, Y. (2007). The effectiveness of a theme-based syllabus for young L2 learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(1), 1-17.
[32] Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge‐based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language learning, 52(2), 439-481.
[33] Catrysse, L., Gijbels, D., and Donche, V. (2018). It is not only about the depth of processing: What if eye am not interested in the text? Learning and Instruction, 58(1), 284-294.
[34] Boscolo, P., and Mason, L. (2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: How. they interact in learning from instructional texts. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 126-148.
[35] Sadan, V. (2014). Mixed methods research: A new approach. International Journal of Nursing Education, 6(1), 254.
[36] Hochschild, J. L. (2009). Conducting intensive interviews and elite interviews. In Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research (pp. 124-127). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
[37] Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (Eighth;8; ed.). Routledge.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education