Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Three Anticoagulation Strategies in Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis for Critically Ill Patients with High Bleeding Risk: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2025.060318 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 98
Author(s)
Yunchuan Zhong 1, Li Shi 1, Yongsheng Qi 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Emergency Department, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan, China
Corresponding Author
Yunchuan ZhongABSTRACT
Optimal anticoagulation strategy for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients with high bleeding risk remains controversial. This study retrospectively evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of three anticoagulation approaches in continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD). We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzing 168 ICU patients with acute kidney injury and high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score ≥3) who underwent CVVHD between January 2022 and April 2025 at three tertiary hospitals in Sichuan Province, China. Based on the anticoagulation strategy chosen by treating physicians, patients were classified into three groups: Group A - low-dose systemic heparin (n=62); Group B - regional citrate anticoagulation (n=54); Group C - heparin-free protocol with saline flushing (n=52). Primary outcomes included filter lifespan and major bleeding events. Secondary outcomes encompassed metabolic complications, inflammatory markers, and 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. After propensity score matching (40 patients per group), median filter lifespan differed significantly among groups (A: 41.3 [IQR 27.5-55.2] h, B: 65.7 [IQR 48.9-82.5] h, C: 29.8 [IQR 20.4-39.2] h; p<0.001). Major bleeding events occurred in 25.0% (10/40) of Group A, 10.0% (4/40) of Group B, and 7.5% (3/40) of Group C patients (p=0.008). Group B demonstrated superior metabolic stability with fewer episodes of metabolic alkalosis (5.0% vs 17.5% vs 12.5%, p=0.041). Inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP, PCT) showed comparable reduction across all groups. The 28-day mortality rates were 32.5%, 25.0%, and 30.0% for Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p=0.651). Multivariate Cox regression identified APACHE II score (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13), vasopressor requirement (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.58-3.29), and baseline platelet count <50×10⁹/L (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.29-2.86) as independent mortality predictors, while anticoagulation strategy was not significantly associated with mortality after adjustment. In real-world practice, regional citrate anticoagulation demonstrated superior filter longevity and reduced bleeding complications compared to low-dose heparin in high-bleeding-risk patients. Heparin-free CVVHD showed the lowest bleeding rates but required more frequent filter changes. These findings support individualized anticoagulation selection based on bleeding risk assessment and institutional capabilities.
KEYWORDS
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy; Anticoagulation; Bleeding Risk; Citrate; Heparin-Free; Retrospective Study; Critical CareCITE THIS PAPER
Yunchuan Zhong, Li Shi, Yongsheng Qi, Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Three Anticoagulation Strategies in Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis for Critically Ill Patients with High Bleeding Risk: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. MEDS Clinical Medicine (2025) Vol. 6: 109-119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medsc.2025.060318.
REFERENCES
[1] Vesconi S, Cruz DN, Fumagalli R, et al. Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2009; 13: R57.
[2] Bagshaw SM, Darmon M, Ostermann M, et al. Current state of the art for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:841-854.
[3] Tandukar S, Palevsky PM. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Who, When, Why, and How. Chest 2019;155: 626-638.
[4] Neuenfeldt FS, Weigand MA, Fischer D. Coagulopathies in Intensive Care Medicine: Balancing Act between Thrombosis and Bleeding. J Clin Med 2021; 10.
[5] Krishnaswamy A, Lincoff AM, Cannon CP. Bleeding complications of unfractionated heparin. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2011;10: 77-84.
[6] Thorevska N, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Sabahi R, et al. Anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with renal insufficiency: a comparison of bleeding rates with unfractionated heparin vs enoxaparin. Chest 2004; 125:856-863.
[7] Peng B, Lu J, Guo H, Liu J, Li A. Regional citrate anticoagulation for replacement therapy in patients with liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1031796.
[8] Kindgen-Milles D, Brandenburger T, Dimski T. Regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy. Curr Opin Crit Care 2018; 24:450-454.
[9] Nanchal R, Subramanian R, Karvellas CJ, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Adult Acute and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in the ICU: Cardiovascular, Endocrine, Hematologic, Pulmonary, and Renal Considerations. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: e173-e191.
[10] Pistolesi V, Morabito S, Pota V, et al. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT): expert opinion from the SIAARTI-SIN joint commission. J Anesth Analg Crit Care 2023; 3: 7.
[11] Brunot V, Serre JE, Mourad G, Klouche K, Pernin V. Heparin-free renal replacement therapy for chronic hemodialyzed patients at high risk for bleeding: a comparison of on-line predilution hemodiafiltration with conventional hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 2018; 22: 463-473.
[12] Ojeda R, Arias-Guillen M, Gomez M, et al. Study of Biocompatibility of Membranes in Online Hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif 2020; 49: 400-408.
[13] Nazari S, Abdelrasoul A. Impact of Membrane Modification and Surface Immobilization Techniques on the Hemocompatibility of Hemodialysis Membranes: A Critical Review. Membranes (Basel) 2022; 12.
[14] Al-Samkari H, Connors JM. Managing the competing risks of thrombosis, bleeding, and anticoagulation in patients with malignancy. Blood Adv 2019; 3: 3770-3779.
[15] Frazer A, Rowland J, Mudge A, Barras M, Martin J, Donovan P. Systematic review of interventions to improve safety and quality of anticoagulant prescribing for therapeutic indications for hospital inpatients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 75: 1645-1657.
[16] Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61: 649-672.
[17] Teng TK, Tromp J, Tay WT, et al. Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e1008-e1018.
[18] Van Walraven C, Jennings A, Oake N, Fergusson D, Forster AJ. Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control: a systematic review and metaregression. Chest 2006;129:1155-1166.
[19] Schulman S. Advantages and limitations of the new anticoagulants. J Intern Med 2014; 275: 1-11.
[20] Wen, Ming et al. "A novel citrate-based protocol versus heparin anticoagulation for sustained low-efficiency dialysis in the ICU: safety, efficacy, and cost." BMC nephrology vol. 19,179. 3 Apr. 2018, doi:10.1186/s12882-018-0879-4
[21] Zhang, Zhongheng, and Ni Hongying. “Efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.” Intensive care medicine vol. 38,1 (2012): 20-8. doi:10.1007/s00134-011-2438-3
[22] Monchi, Mehran et al. "Citrate vs. heparin for anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a prospective randomized study." Intensive care medicine vol. 30,2 (2004): 260-265. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-2047-x
[23] Bylapudi, Seshu Kumar et al. "Role of Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score in Predicting Outcomes of Peritonitis Due to Hollow Viscous Perforation: A Prospective Observational Study." Cureus vol. 13,12 e20155. 4 Dec. 2021, doi:10.7759/cureus.20155
Downloads: | 9214 |
---|---|
Visits: | 555926 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Neurobiology and Genetics
-
Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine
-
Bacterial Genetics and Ecology
-
Transactions on Cancer
-
Journal of Biophysics and Ecology
-
Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary
-
Academic Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
-
Transactions on Cell and Developmental Biology
-
Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology
-
Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
-
Hematology and Stem Cell
-
Journal of Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Engineering
-
MEDS Basic Medicine
-
MEDS Stomatology
-
MEDS Public Health and Preventive Medicine
-
MEDS Chinese Medicine
-
Journal of Enzyme Engineering
-
Advances in Industrial Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
Bacteriology and Microbiology
-
Advances in Physiology and Pathophysiology
-
Journal of Vision and Ophthalmology
-
Frontiers of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Digestive Disease and Diabetes
-
Advances in Immunology and Vaccines
-
Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery
-
Cardiology and Vascular System
-
Pediatrics and Child Health
-
Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Contraception
-
Journal of Respiratory and Lung Disease
-
Journal of Bioinformatics and Biomedicine