Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Strategic Anxiety and Security Dilemma in the Indo-Pacific: A Defensive Realist Analysis of Australia–China Relations

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2025.070307 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 217

Author(s)

Linxi Li 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, Australia

Corresponding Author

Linxi Li

ABSTRACT

This article explores the deterioration of security relations between Australia and China from the perspective of defensive realism, with a focus on the dynamics of security dilemmas. In the study, Australia's strategic shift has led to a feedback loop of misunderstanding, military escalation, and alliance dependence, particularly in the context of AUKUS, the South China Sea, and Taiwan (China). This article also emphasizes the limitations of defensive realism by integrating the perspective of ontological security theory, arguing that Australia's behavior is not only influenced by material power considerations, but also by identity anxiety and normative consistency with the Western dominated rule-based order. The report concludes by proposing institutional mechanisms, including military hotlines, transparency measures, and inclusive dialogue, as a way to manage strategic distrust and mitigate escalation.

KEYWORDS

Australia–China Relations; Security Dilemma; Defensive Realism; Indo-Pacific

CITE THIS PAPER

Linxi Li, Strategic Anxiety and Security Dilemma in the Indo-Pacific: A Defensive Realist Analysis of Australia–China Relations. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2025) Vol. 7: 52-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2025.070307.

REFERENCES

[1] Australian Department of Defence. (2023). National defence: Defence strategic review 2023. Commonwealth of Australia.
[2] Bishop, J., Maude, R., Charlesworth, H., & Medcalf, R. (n.d.). Australia's security and the rules–based order. Lowy Institute.
[3] Camut, N. (2023). China warns AUKUS: You've gone down a "dangerous road". Politico Europe. https://www. politico.eu/article/aukus-submarine-deal-dangerous-road-china-foreign-ministry-wang-wenbin/
[4] Evans, G. (2021). Australia must hold US to 'no quid pro quo' guarantee with AUKUS. AFR. https://www. afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/australia-must-hold-us-to-no-quid-pro-quo-guarantee-with-aukus-20210923-p58u3m
[5] Gomez, J. (2025, April 21). US general says allied forces can repel Asia aggression as Philippines combat drills open. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/balikatan-military-exercises-us-philippines-taiwan-china-95ebd361fd326 1339c6edbaccd2f60af
[6] Korolev, A. (2023). Transition from hedging to balancing in Australia’s China policy: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 77(5), 548–568. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10357718. 2023. 2222140
[7] Kwon, J. (2020). When the Kangaroo Encounters the Flying Dragon: The growth of balancing elements in Australia's China policy. Pacific Focus, 35(3), 491–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12163
[8] Taliaferro, J. W. (2001). Security seeking under anarchy: Defensive realism revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560525
[9] Tencent website (April 8, 2024). The Australian Prime Minister has promised that within just half a month, Australian lawmakers will visit Taiwan and say that the current situation in the Taiwan Strait will not be changed. Tencent News. https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20240408A06KZN00
[10] Wang, J., & Wei, Y. (2023). Australia's China policy transformation from the perspective of ontological security. Foreign Affairs Review (Journal of China Foreign Affairs University), 40(3), 106–130.
[11] Wolpe, B. (2023). Trump's Australia: How Trumpism changed Australia and the shocking consequences for us of a second term. Allen & Unwin.
[12] Zhang, B. (2021). From defensive toward offensive realism: Strategic competition and continuities in the United States' China policy. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(137), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.2010885

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.