A Reading Text Difficulty Analysis of Senior High School English Textbooks (Version A)
DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2025.080501 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 255
Author(s)
Yutong Xiao 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Education, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, China
Corresponding Author
Yutong XiaoABSTRACT
This study researches 3 compulsory volumes and 4 selective compulsory volumes of senior high school English textbooks(version A), using Coh-Metrix and the Compleat Lexical Tutor to analyze the Coh-Metrix L2 readability level, five indices(narrativity, syntactic simplicity, word concreteness, referential cohesion, deep cohesion) in Coh-Metrix and the proportion of academic words of their reading texts. The findings are: Overall the reading texts in the selective compulsory modules are more difficult than those in the compulsory modules, but the progressive relationship between the 2 modules is unclear. Scores of the five indices and the proportion of academic words fluctuate across different volumes, but with a general trend of increasing difficulty from compulsory modules to selective compulsory modules, except for the narrativity scores and AW ratio. This study employs a quantitative method to assess textbook difficulty, with the aim of providing insights for future textbook compilation and the enhancement of English teaching practices.
KEYWORDS
Difficulty, Reading Texts, Senior High School English TextbooksCITE THIS PAPER
Yutong Xiao, A Reading Text Difficulty Analysis of Senior High School English Textbooks (Version A). Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2025) Vol. 8: 1-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2025.080501.
REFERENCES
[1] Shu D, Zhuang Z. Modern Foreign Language Teaching: Theory, Practice and Methods (Revised Edition) [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2008.
[2] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. English Curriculum Standards for General Senior High School (2017 Edition) [S]. Beijing: People’s Education Press, 2018.
[3] Zou W. Research on the English Curriculum Standards and Textbook Analysis [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2023.
[4] Deng Z, Duan F, Zhang P. A comparative study on the difficulty of college English textbooks[J]. China University Teaching, 2002(Z2): 57-59+62.
[5] McNamara D S, Graesser A C, McCarthy P M, et al. Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[6] Crossley S A, Allen D B, McNamara D S. Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas[J]. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2011, 23(1): 84-101.
[7] Crossley S A, McNamara D S. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2014, 26: 66-79.
[8] Jiang J, Han B. A Coh-Metrix-based study on text difficulty of CET-6, TOEFL and IELTS reading passages[J]. Foreign Languages in China,2018,15(03):86-95.
[9] Hui Y. Twenty years of research on English textbooks at home and abroad[J].Research in Teaching,2020, 43(04): 38-49.
[10] Chen S. An Analysis of Difficulty Level of Reading Part for PEP Textbooks(2019) in Senior High School [D]. Chongqing Normal University,2021.
[11] Chen X. A Comparative Study on Text Difficulty of the Reading Texts in the New and Old Editions of High School English Textbooks by Yilin Press [D].Hunan University, 2022.
[12] Goldman S R. Adolescent literacy: Learning and understanding content[J]. The Future of Children, 2012: 89-116.
[13] Graesser A C, McNamara D S, Kulikowich J M. Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics[J]. Educational Researcher, 2011, 40(5): 223-234.
[14] McNamara D S, Kintsch E, Songer N B, et al. Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 1996, 14(1): 1-43.
[15] Liang M, Xu J. A Guide to Corpus Applications [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2023.
[16] Worthington D, Nation P. Using texts to sequence the introduction of new vocabulary in an EAP course[J]. RELC Journal, 1996, 27(2): 1-11.
Downloads: | 36682 |
---|---|
Visits: | 1490133 |