Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

An Exploration of Patient Capital on Enterprise Digital Transformation

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/acccm.2025.070311 | Downloads: 23 | Views: 339

Author(s)

Lingli Ran 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China

Corresponding Author

Lingli Ran

ABSTRACT

This study examines the impact of patient capital on enterprise digital transformation based on data from A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2023 (32,665 observations). Patient capital is defined as stable equity (measured by the shareholding ratio of long-term institutional investors). Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis reveal that the shareholding ratio of institutional investors is significantly positively correlated with the degree of digital transformation (β=0.015, p<0.05), though the effect size is smaller than traditional factors such as firm size. The findings suggest that patient capital promotes enterprise digital transformation by mitigating information asymmetry and providing long-term financial support, with its mechanism linked to reducing managerial short-termism. These conclusions enrich the theory of enterprise innovation and provide empirical evidence for fostering patient capital and advancing digital transformation.

KEYWORDS

Patient Capital, Digital Transformation, Long-Term Investment, Information Asymmetry

CITE THIS PAPER

Lingli Ran, An Exploration of Patient Capital on Enterprise Digital Transformation. Accounting and Corporate Management (2025) Vol. 7: 80-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2025.070311.

REFERENCES

[1] Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
[2] Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1.
[3] Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & information systems engineering, 57(5), 339–343.
[4] Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021a). Agility for Successful Digital Transformation. Digital Transformation Management for Agile Organizations: A Compass to Sail the Digital World (167–188).
[5] Ukko J, Nasiri M, Saunila M, et al. Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 236: 117626.
[6] Liang X., Liu A M M. The evolution of government sponsored collaboration network and its impact on innovation: A bibliometric analysis in the Chinese solar PV sector. Research Policy, 2018, 47(7), 1295 - 1308.
[7] Boxu Y, Xingguang L, Kou K. Research on the influence of network embeddedness on innovation performance: evidence from China's listed firms[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022, 7(3): 100 - 210.
[8] Dahlander L, McFarland D A. Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2013, 58(1): 69-110.
[9] Deeg R, Hardie I. What is patient capital and who supplies it?[J]. Socio-economic review, 2016, 14(4): 627-645.
[10] Ivashinav, Lerner J. Patient capital: the challenges and promises of long-term investing [M]. Princeton University Press, 2019.
[11] Creamers M, Pareek A. Patient capital outperformance: the investment skill of high active share managers who trade infrequently [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016,122(2): 288-306.
[12] Kaplan SB. Globalizing patient capital: the political economy of Chinese finance in the Americas [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[13] Singh S, Sharma M, Dhir S. Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry[J]. Technology in Society, 2021, 67: 101763.
[14] Fletcher G, Griffiths M. Digital transformation during a lockdown[J]. International journal of information management, 2020, 55: 102185.
[15] Lin J Y, Wang Y. The new structural economics: Patient capital as a comparative advantage[J]. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development (2017) Volume, 2017, 1: 4-23.
[16] Zhang J, Jiang H, Wu R, et al. Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing: A network pluralism framework of firms' R&D alliance network and innovation performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(7): 2635-2665.
[17] Wu S, Li Y. A study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of green innovation[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8): 6568.
[18] Fernandez-Vidal J, Perotti F A, Gonzalez R, et al. Managing digital transformation: The view from the top[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 152: 29-41.
[19] David, P., O'Brien, J. P., Yoshikawa, T. The Implications of Debt Heterogeneity for R&D Investment and Firm Performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 1(1):165-181.

Downloads: 35683
Visits: 568752

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.