An Exploration of Patient Capital on Enterprise Digital Transformation
DOI: 10.23977/acccm.2025.070311 | Downloads: 23 | Views: 339
Author(s)
Lingli Ran 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China
Corresponding Author
Lingli RanABSTRACT
This study examines the impact of patient capital on enterprise digital transformation based on data from A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2023 (32,665 observations). Patient capital is defined as stable equity (measured by the shareholding ratio of long-term institutional investors). Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis reveal that the shareholding ratio of institutional investors is significantly positively correlated with the degree of digital transformation (β=0.015, p<0.05), though the effect size is smaller than traditional factors such as firm size. The findings suggest that patient capital promotes enterprise digital transformation by mitigating information asymmetry and providing long-term financial support, with its mechanism linked to reducing managerial short-termism. These conclusions enrich the theory of enterprise innovation and provide empirical evidence for fostering patient capital and advancing digital transformation.
KEYWORDS
Patient Capital, Digital Transformation, Long-Term Investment, Information AsymmetryCITE THIS PAPER
Lingli Ran, An Exploration of Patient Capital on Enterprise Digital Transformation. Accounting and Corporate Management (2025) Vol. 7: 80-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2025.070311.
REFERENCES
[1] Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
[2] Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1.
[3] Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & information systems engineering, 57(5), 339–343.
[4] Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021a). Agility for Successful Digital Transformation. Digital Transformation Management for Agile Organizations: A Compass to Sail the Digital World (167–188).
[5] Ukko J, Nasiri M, Saunila M, et al. Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 236: 117626.
[6] Liang X., Liu A M M. The evolution of government sponsored collaboration network and its impact on innovation: A bibliometric analysis in the Chinese solar PV sector. Research Policy, 2018, 47(7), 1295 - 1308.
[7] Boxu Y, Xingguang L, Kou K. Research on the influence of network embeddedness on innovation performance: evidence from China's listed firms[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022, 7(3): 100 - 210.
[8] Dahlander L, McFarland D A. Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2013, 58(1): 69-110.
[9] Deeg R, Hardie I. What is patient capital and who supplies it?[J]. Socio-economic review, 2016, 14(4): 627-645.
[10] Ivashinav, Lerner J. Patient capital: the challenges and promises of long-term investing [M]. Princeton University Press, 2019.
[11] Creamers M, Pareek A. Patient capital outperformance: the investment skill of high active share managers who trade infrequently [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016,122(2): 288-306.
[12] Kaplan SB. Globalizing patient capital: the political economy of Chinese finance in the Americas [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[13] Singh S, Sharma M, Dhir S. Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry[J]. Technology in Society, 2021, 67: 101763.
[14] Fletcher G, Griffiths M. Digital transformation during a lockdown[J]. International journal of information management, 2020, 55: 102185.
[15] Lin J Y, Wang Y. The new structural economics: Patient capital as a comparative advantage[J]. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development (2017) Volume, 2017, 1: 4-23.
[16] Zhang J, Jiang H, Wu R, et al. Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing: A network pluralism framework of firms' R&D alliance network and innovation performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(7): 2635-2665.
[17] Wu S, Li Y. A study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of green innovation[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8): 6568.
[18] Fernandez-Vidal J, Perotti F A, Gonzalez R, et al. Managing digital transformation: The view from the top[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 152: 29-41.
[19] David, P., O'Brien, J. P., Yoshikawa, T. The Implications of Debt Heterogeneity for R&D Investment and Firm Performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 1(1):165-181.
Downloads: | 35683 |
---|---|
Visits: | 568752 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics