Dilemma and Countermeasures of Safety Management of Old Houses in the Context of Resilient Cities
DOI: 10.23977/socsam.2025.060110 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 274
Author(s)
Wei Li 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Urban Construction and Safety Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, China
Corresponding Author
Wei LiABSTRACT
Global warming and urban growth have intensified the need for managing old house safety to build resilient cities. Most old houses worldwide are over 20 years old and face issues like weakened structural integrity, inadequate fire safety, high reliance on government funds, and low digital inspection rates. Different countries have adopted various strategies: Japan's Kobe improved earthquake detection sixfold with satellite and digital twin tech, Berlin enhanced structural monitoring with fiber sensors, and Bangkok cut hazard detection time by two-thirds using drones and AI. Funding solutions include Paris's public-private partnership model, Shenzhen's use of parking revenue for renovations, Singapore's rooftop solar savings, South Africa's disaster fund, and India's developer incentives. Governance approaches involve the EU's three-sector linkage and Seoul's high resident engagement, with Latin American countries reducing residents' costs through subsidies and credits. These measures have cut hidden dangers and detection errors by 60%, boosted social capital involvement by 30-40%, and enhanced emergency response by over 50%. This demonstrates the importance of tech adaptation, local mechanisms, and cooperation in solving old house safety issues, offering a learning path for tech transfer and institutional innovation, as well as improving governance efficiency.
KEYWORDS
Old Houses; Safety Management; Resilient Cities; Multi-dimensional Assessment; Collaborative ManagementCITE THIS PAPER
Wei Li, Dilemma and Countermeasures of Safety Management of Old Houses in the Context of Resilient Cities. Social Security and Administration Management (2025) Vol. 6: 75-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/socsam.2025.060110.
REFERENCES
[1] Jiwei Zhang. Harmonization of Urban Development and Nature Conservation Environment Based on Machine Learning [J]. Nature Environmental Protection, 2022, 3(1): 18-25.
[2] Lv Zhihan, Dongliang Chen, Jinhua Li. Novel System Design and Implementation for Smart City Vertical Market[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2021, 1(2): 23-41.
[3] Li F, Zhou T, Dong Y, & Zhou W. Design of the 3D Digital Reconstruction System of an Urban Landscape Spatial Pattern Based on the Internet of Things[J]. International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach, 2023, 16(2): 1-14.
[4] Rodrigues N G, Han C Q Y, Su Y, et al. Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID‐19 pandemic: A scoping review[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2022, 78(3): 609-644.
[5] Capacci L, Biondini F, Frangopol D M. Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks[J]. Resilient Cities and Structures, 2022, 1(2): 23-41.
[6] Zhengzhao Li, Dafang Fu, Junxian W, et al. Urban resilience assessment model for waterlogging disasters and its application[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(2): 266-276.
[7] Williams J. Circular cities: planning for circular development in European cities[J]. European Planning Studies, 2023, 31(1): 14-35.
[8] Ruiz-Mallén I, Satorras M, March H, et al. Community climate resilience and environmental education: Opportunities and challenges for transformative learning[J]. Environmental Education Research, 2022, 28(7): 1088-1107.
[9] Konijnendijk C C. Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: Introducing the 3–30–300 rule[J]. Journal of forestry research, 2023, 34(3): 821-830.
[10] Pei W, Guo X, Lo T. Pre-Evaluation method of the experiential architecture based on multidimensional physiological perception[J]. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2023, 22(3): 1170-1194.
[11] Taşcı M Z. Multidimensional performance evaluation using the hybrid MCDM method: A case study in the Turkish non-life insurance sector [J]. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 2024, 11(2): 854-883.
[12] Luo P, Hu W, Jiang L, et al. Evaluation of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis using hybrid multidimensional MRI[J]. Clinical Radiology, 2022, 77(7): 518-525.
[13] Zhao J, Wang X, Wang S, et al. An evaluation method for pavement maintenance priority classification based on an unsupervised data-driven multidimensional performance model[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2022, 47(10): 13265-13278.
[14] Qibin Wu, Guosheng W, Xiangyang Z, et al. Influence of population differences on multidimensional sound quality evaluation [J]. Technical Acoustics, 2025, 44(2): 252-260.
Downloads: | 5860 |
---|---|
Visits: | 222224 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics