Analysis of Urban Economic Spatial Development and Integrated Development Strategies in the Yangtze River Delta
DOI: 10.23977/infse.2024.050512 | Downloads: 13 | Views: 594
Author(s)
Xianglai Chen 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Business, Nanjing University of Science and Technology ZiJin College, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
Corresponding Author
Xianglai ChenABSTRACT
This paper takes 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta from 2000 to 2022 as the research object, reveals the evolution law of the regional economic spatial pattern and proposes an integrated development strategy. This study combines spatial econometric models, geographically weighted regression analysis and multidimensional scaling analysis, and uses indicators such as economic density index, spatial association network density and centrality to evaluate regional economic characteristics. The results show that the region presents a significant "core-periphery" distribution feature, among which Shanghai, Nanjing, Hangzhou and Suzhou are core cities, with economic density indexes of 376.5, 215.3, 198.7 and 186.1 respectively in 2022, while peripheral cities such as Anqing and Huaibei are less than 50. Shanghai's economic network density has increased from 0.26 in 2000 to 0.49 in 2022, and inter-city connections have been significantly enhanced, but the economic spillover effects of the core city on surrounding cities are still limited. Based on this, the study proposes to strengthen the radiation and driving role of core cities, optimize the division of labor and layout of the industrial chain, strengthen support for relatively economically backward regions and improve economic linkages among regions, thereby promoting coordinated development and high-quality integration in the Yangtze River Delta region.
KEYWORDS
Integrated Development of the Yangtze River Delta, Urban Economic Spatial Pattern, Spatial Econometric Analysis, Regional Coordinated Development StrategyCITE THIS PAPER
Xianglai Chen, Analysis of Urban Economic Spatial Development and Integrated Development Strategies in the Yangtze River Delta. Information Systems and Economics (2024) Vol. 5: 82-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infse.2024.050512.
REFERENCES
[1] Cao W, Zeng G, Zhu S, et al. High-quality integrated development in the Yangtze River Delta region: Problems and solutions[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1385-1402.
[2] Zhao W, Jiang C. Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Dynamic Effects of Urban-Rural Integration Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J]. Land, 2022, 11(7): 10-54.
[3] Wu J, Sun W. Regional Integration and Sustainable Development in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Towards a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda[J]. Land, 2023, 12(2): 470.
[4] Chen W, Lan M, Sun W, et al. Integrated high-quality development of the Yangtze River Delta: Connotation, current situation and countermeasures[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1403-1412.
[5] Jianbao L I, Hongmei C, Hao M, et al. The Impact of Regional Integration on Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta: A Multidimensional Perspective[J]. Economic geography, 2024, 44(4): 43-54.
[6] Wen C, Wei Liu, Feng Y, et al. Missions and research agendas of regional integration development in Yangtze River Delta oriented by the Chinese Path to Modernization[J]. Economic geography, 2023, 43(5): 8-15.
[7] Li Z, Hu S, Liu H. An appraisal of the Yangtze River Delta eco-green integrated development demonstration zone[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(24): 30-35.
[8] Zhang Y, Haseeb M, Hossain M E, et al. Study on the coupling and coordination degree between urban tourism development and habitat environment in the Yangtze River Delta in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(6): 14805-14820.
[9] Gan T, Yang H, Liang W, et al. Do economic development and population agglomeration inevitably aggravate haze pollution in China? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(5): 5063-5079.
[10] Malutta S, Kobiyama M, Chaffe P L B, et al. Hysteresis analysis to quantify and qualify the sediment dynamics: State of the art[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2020, 81(12): 2471-2487.
[11] Rüttenauer T. Spatial regression models: a systematic comparison of different model specifications using Monte Carlo experiments[J]. Sociological Methods & Research, 2022, 51(2): 728-759.
[12] Shabrina Z, Buyuklieva B, Ng M K M. Short‐term rental platform in the urban tourism context: A geographically weighted regression (GWR) and a multiscale GWR (MGWR) approaches[J]. Geographical Analysis, 2021, 53(4): 686-707.
[13] Ma Y, Zhou X. Spatially informed cell-type deconvolution for spatial transcriptomics[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2022, 40(9): 1349-1359.
[14] Demeter S J. Economic Considerations for Radiation Protection in Medical Settings—Is It Time for a New Paradigm?[J]. Health Physics, 2021, 120(2): 217-223.
[15] Mademlis I, Voulgaris G, Pitas I. Fast multidimensional scaling on big geospatial data using neural networks[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16(3): 2241-2249.
Downloads: | 19144 |
---|---|
Visits: | 450594 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics