Reforming Organic Chemistry Laboratory Teaching in the Context of Emerging Engineering Disciplines: Strategies and Impacts
DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2024.070727 | Downloads: 22 | Views: 782
Author(s)
Bowen Fang 1, Lihua Chen 1, Shaofeng Pang 1, Bin Zhang 1
Affiliation(s)
1 College of Chemical Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, China
Corresponding Author
Bowen FangABSTRACT
In the context of emerging engineering disciplines, experimental teaching plays a crucial role in developing students' engineering practice abilities, especially in application-oriented undergraduate institutions. In chemistry education, the organic chemistry laboratory course is a fundamental core course for chemistry-related majors and holds significant value for students to gain a deeper understanding of chemical knowledge and enhance their practical skills. However, with the continuous evolution of the times, traditional organic chemistry laboratory teaching methods no longer meet the needs of university students or the demands of societal development. This paper uses the organic chemistry laboratory course at the School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, as a case study. It explores various measures such as improving teaching content and methods, incorporating online teaching tools, integrating ideological and political education, reforming the experimental assessment process, and constructing a new learning evaluation system. These reforms aim to develop students' abilities and enhance the quality of teaching. The implementation of these strategies can effectively improve the quality of organic chemistry laboratory teaching, thus contributing to the cultivation of high-level, application-oriented talents.
KEYWORDS
Outcome-Based Education (OBE) Teaching Philosophy, Emerging Engineering Education, Organic Chemical Experimental Teaching Reform, Ideological and Political EducationCITE THIS PAPER
Bowen Fang, Lihua Chen, Shaofeng Pang, Bin Zhang, Reforming Organic Chemistry Laboratory Teaching in the Context of Emerging Engineering Disciplines: Strategies and Impacts. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2024) Vol. 7: 178-184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2024.070727.
REFERENCES
[1] Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
[2] Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The Role of Laboratory Work in University Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172-185.
[3] Marisa G. Weaver, Andrey V. Samoshin, Robert B. Lewis, and Morgan J. Gainer. (2016). Developing Students' Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Analysis Skills in an Inquiry-Based Synthetic Organic Laboratory Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(5), 847-851.
[4] Seery, M. K., Agustian, H. Y., Doidge, E. D., Kucharski, M. M., O' Connor, H. M., & McDonnell, C. (2019). Developing Laboratory Skills by Incorporating Peer-Review and Digital Badging into Laboratory Practical Classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1098-1108.
[5] Christina Goudreau Collison, Dina L. Newman, Julia Qingli Biehler, Micaela Nelson, Paige O’Brien Daly, Matthew Jackson, Cameron Isaac, Madeline Tebrugge, Jason Anderson, Brian Edelbach, Douglas Tusch, Jeremy Alan Cody. (2022). Reformed Experimental Activities (REActivities): Gauging the Fidelity of Implementation in a Reformed Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(5), 2032-2043.
[6] Fun Man Fung, Simon Francis Watts. (2019). Bridges to the Future: Toward Future Ready Graduates in Chemistry Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1620-1629.
Downloads: | 36690 |
---|---|
Visits: | 1491842 |