Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Dynamic Analysis of Agenda-Setting on the "Belt and Road Initiative" Topic on Twitter from 2013 to 2023

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/mediacr.2024.050226 | Downloads: 2 | Views: 68

Author(s)

Ning Ning 1, Wong Yu'ou 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Journalism, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Ning Ning

ABSTRACT

Gaining the initiative in agenda-setting on international media platforms is crucial for constructing China's international discourse system and enhancing international communication capabilities. Using China's "Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI) as a case study, this study focuses on the direction, intensity, and trend changes of agenda-setting between Chinese mainstream media and international mainstream media on Twitter over ten years. This study found that Chinese mainstream media's agenda-setting showed a fluctuating upward trend, gradually gaining dominance and moving away from the influence of international mainstream media. The "intensity" of agenda-setting also reflected China's strong international discourse guidance.

KEYWORDS

International Communication, China's International Discourse Power, "Belt and Road Initiative", Media Discourse, Agenda-Setting

CITE THIS PAPER

Ning Ning, Wong Yu'ou, Dynamic Analysis of Agenda-Setting on the "Belt and Road Initiative" Topic on Twitter from 2013 to 2023. Media and Communication Research (2024) Vol. 5: 179-186. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/mediacr.2024.050226.

REFERENCES

[1] McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
[2] Kiousis, S. & McCombs, M. (2004). Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: Political figures during the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 31(1), 36–57.
[3] Jiang, X.C. & Zhong, X. (2021). Duplication on Refraction in Network Agenda Setting: A Comparative Study of American and French Media Reporting and Public Opinion on "Black Lives Matter". Global Journal of Media Studies (04), 103-119. doi:10.16602/j.gjms.20210033.
[4] Shi, A.B. & Wong, P.N. (2017). Agenda-Setting Theory in the last 10 years: Origins, Development and Prospects for the Future. Journalism & Communication (10), 13-28+127.
[5] Pu, X.P. (2023). The Belt and Road Initiative: Achievements and Contemporary Relevance. International Forum (03), 37-51+156-157. doi:10.13549/j.cnki.cn11-3959/d.2023.03.003.
[6] Jing, X.M. (2015). Political Communication Institute of Communication University of China. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication (08), 6-19. doi:10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2015.08.001.
[7] Ji, D.Q. & Yan, B.W. (2023). In Pursuit of Subjectivity: The Belt and Road Initiative and the Imagination od International Communication Studies. Media Observer (09), 28-35. doi:10.19480/j.cnki.cmgc.2023.09.001.
[8] Xu, Z.W. & Chen, Y. (2020). Dilemma and Countermeasure Research on Agenda Setting in New Mainstream Media. Chinese Editors Journal (11), 21-24.
[9] Wong, Y.J. & Shi, W. (2023). Chinese Mainstream Media Agenda-Setting on Twitter: An Analysis on the Issue of China's Poverty Alleviation. Global Journal of Media Studies (04), 53-72.
[10] Wong, H.X. & Yu, D.S. (2020). Intermedia Agenda-Setting on Weibo Platform: An Analysis of Public Opinion on Trending Events in 2018. Journalism Research (06), 82-96+125.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.