Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on the application risks and countermeasures of ChatGPT generative artificial intelligence in social work

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jaip.2024.070222 | Downloads: 4 | Views: 71

Author(s)

Yuan Yi 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, China

Corresponding Author

Yuan Yi

ABSTRACT

Since its debut on November 30, 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT has rapidly transformed natural language processing (NLP) and artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC). Leveraging Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) technology, ChatGPT offers cost-effective, efficient, and diverse content creation. Despite advancements like GPT-4, concerns about data security, algorithmic bias, and ethical issues persist, especially in social work. AI integration in social work presents challenges such as potential data breaches and weakened interpersonal connections, necessitating robust regulations and ethical guidelines. Addressing these issues requires strict data protection, diverse AI training datasets, and transparency in AI-driven decisions. By balancing technological integration with humanistic values, AI can enhance social work efficiency while maintaining essential human care and support. This ensures AI serves as a beneficial tool rather than replacing human contributions.

KEYWORDS

Data Security; Algorithmic Bias; Ethical Guidelines; Social Work Integration

CITE THIS PAPER

Yuan Yi, Research on the application risks and countermeasures of ChatGPT generative artificial intelligence in social work. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice (2024) Vol. 7: 166-172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jaip.2024.070222.

REFERENCES

[1] Agoldende, D. J. (2022). A Golden Decade of Deep Learning: Computing Systems & Applications. Daedalus, 151(2), 58-74.
[2] Fuchs, D. J. (2018). The Dangers of Human-like Bias in Machine-learning Algorithms. Missouri S&T's Peer Peer, 2(1), 1.
[3] Kasneci, E., Sebler, K., Küchemann, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
[4] Hartmann, J., Schwenzow, J., & Witte, M. (2023). The Political Ideology of Conversational AI: Converging Evidence on ChatGPT's Pro-environmental, Left-Libertarian Orientation. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2301. 01768.
[5] Rozado, D. (2023). The Political Biases of ChatGPT. Social Sciences, 12(3), 148.
[6] McGee, R. W. (2023). Is ChatGPT Biased Against Conservatives? An Empirical Study. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/1 0.2139/ssrn.4359405.

Downloads: 8083
Visits: 213604

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.