Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Analysis of Technological Ethical Issues in Generative Artificial Intelligence

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jaip.2024.070220 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 144

Author(s)

Liu Weijia 1, Li Miaomiao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Liu Weijia

ABSTRACT

At present, generative AI represented by ChatGPT has great potential and development prospects in education ecology, academia, media and public domain, etc. However, it also faces many ethical challenges, such as the weakening of human subjectivity, bias and algorithmic discrimination, privacy and data security issues, and impact on the value system. Actively exploring the good recipe for ethical governance of science and technology will help promote agile governance and make science and technology develop for the better.

KEYWORDS

Ethics of science and technology, Generative AI, bias and algorithmic discrimination

CITE THIS PAPER

Liu Weijia, Li Miaomiao, The Analysis of Technological Ethical Issues in Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice (2024) Vol. 7: 155-160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jaip.2024.070220.

REFERENCES

[1] Huang Shijin. "Help" and "Replacement": The Dual Effects of Generative AI on Academic Research[J/OL]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2024,(02):65-74[2024-04-16].
[2] Zheng Quan. Knowledge production and dissemination paradigm change and response of generative artificial intelligence[J]. Natural dialectics research, 2024, 40(03):74-82.
[3] Xiaheng Zhang. ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence technology embedded in digital government governance: value, risk and its prevention and control[J]. E-Government, 2023,(04):45-56.
[4] Zou Kailiang, Liu Zubing.The Ethical Risks of ChatGPT and China's Institutional Arrangements for Response[J]. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 41(04):74-84. 
[5] HU Bing, ZHONG Siyue. Implications of the Dutch Prejudicial Technological Ethics Thought for AIGC Governance [J]. Young Journalist, 2024(02):48-54.
[6] Zhang Haopeng, Xia Baohua. How Artificial Moral Intelligence is Feasible - Based on an Examination of Value Sensitive Design[J]. Natural dialectics research, 2021,37(04):37-42.

Downloads: 8083
Visits: 213617

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.